Skip to content

Must an SDS always include an exposure scenario?

When you receive a safety data sheet (SDS) for the chemicals you work with, you must check whether you have applied the risk management measures (RMMs) as specified on the SDS. When it is an extended SDS (e-SDS), you must additionally check whether the exposure scenario covers your (conditions of) use and potentially that of your downstream clients. But what determines whether you receive a ‘normal’ SDS or an e-SDS? Can you conclude that your supplier is non-compliant if he does not provide you with an exposure scenario? In short, the answer is “probably not”. However, to explain why not, we have to take a step back and take a closer look at the first step of the REACH process: registration.

Registration, the R in REACH

REACH registration is obligatory for substances manufactured or imported (either on their own or in mixtures) in quantities from one tonne per year per registrant. For each substance a registration dossier must be compiled, containing information on substance identity, manufacturing and use, hazard profile, and exposure. Registrants who manufacture or import hazardous substances in tonnages above 10 tonnes per year, must additionally perform a chemical safety assessment (CSA) and complete a chemical safety report (CSR).

Exposure scenarios are prepared as part of chemical safety assessment (CSA)

In a CSA the risk for human health and the environment as well as physical hazards (for example flammability or explosiveness) are further evaluated. In case the substance is identified as belonging to certain hazard classes (specified in REACH Article 14), the CSA must be extended with an exposure assessment and risk characterisation. In this process, the hazard and exposure are balanced against each other. The more severe the hazard, the lower the acceptable level of exposure. The effect of RMMs on health and environmental risk is evaluated and operational conditions (OCs) are tweaked until the conditions of safe use are determined. The resulting set of instructions is called an exposure scenario (ES). Multiple ESs may be generated for one substance; one for each type of use or set of OCs. For example, ventilation instructions applicable to a closed industrial process will differ from those specified for professional use. ESs must be placed in an Annex to the substance’s SDS.

Exposure scenarios are not always obligatory

Although a CSA and a CSR are generally required for all substances subject to registration in quantities of 10 tonnes or more, an ES is only required for substances meeting the criteria of REACH Article 14. These criteria include the classification of a substance as hazardous in many (but not all) hazard classes and the identification of a substance as persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) or very persistent and very bioaccumulative (vPvB).

Exposure scenarios for chemical mixtures

When product formulators use substances in their mixtures, for which ESs have been provided by the supplier(s), they are obliged to include these ESs in their product SDSs where relevant. There are multiple ways in which this can be done. The formulator can:

  1. Forward ESs for each mixture component to the customer without consolidation
  2. Extract relevant information on RMMs and OCs and include them in the main body of the product SDS
  3. Consolidate the received ESs into new “Mixture ES” annexed to SDS

In other words, as the end-user of a chemical product, you may find the relevant information in a single ES, multiple ESs, or divided over a different section of the SDS. Moreover, in case the uses of product formulators and the end-users of their products were not previously included in the CSA for the individual mixture components, formulators may decide to perform a downstream user CSA (DU CSA), which may include the generating of exposure scenarios.

Judging whether exposure scenarios are required is not always straightforward

Although not very satisfactory, the take-home message of this article is that it is not easy to judge whether your supplier has fulfilled his hazard communication obligations under REACH. The quality of an SDS cannot be judged by the presence or absence of attached exposure scenarios. As explained, this is especially true for chemical mixtures and end-products. The result of the 2014-15 survey conducted by the Dutch Workplace Inspectorate (ISZW), which showed that <20% of the supplier SDSs contain an ES, should therefore not (per definition) be mistaken as an indicator of non-compliance.

Exposure scenario or not, what can you do to check the quality of your suppliers’ SDSs?

The Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment and ISZW have recently launched an SDS check tool (only available in Dutch). Although this tool is limited in its use, it can provide the first step toward identifying SDS compliance issues.

 

Our news articles are only available in English.

REACH

Subscribe to our newsletter

Would you like articles like this in your mailbox once every quarter? Sign up for our newsletter!

Subscribe to newsletter - News

Related Service & Industry

Chemicals & CoatingCompliance & Legislation

Want to know more?

Reach out to our experts.

Other news

Our experience with LCA critical review

Our experience with LCA critical review

At Ecomatters, conducting critical reviews is central to how we help companies improve the credibility,…

Find out what happened at the SETAC Europe 35th annual conference

Find out what happened at the SETAC Europe 35th annual conference

The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) is a global organisation committed to advancing…

RFNBO Certification for Green Hydrogen at Nobian

RFNBO Certification for Green Hydrogen at Nobian

Scaling up renewable fuels like hydrogen is a cornerstone of the European Union’s decarbonisation strategy…

Working at Ecomatters – My experience (so far!)

Working at Ecomatters – My experience (so far!)

In this article, Sustainability Consultant Mo Bei Du describes his experience working at Ecomatters over…

Highlights from our webinar on PEFCR development

Highlights from our webinar on PEFCR development

On 16 April 2025, Ecomatters successfully hosted a dedicated webinar on Product Environmental Footprint Category…

Integrating LCA into Horizon Europe 2025 proposals

Integrating LCA into Horizon Europe 2025 proposals

The European Commission is set to publish the Horizon Europe 2025 work programmes in April…

The latest on SBTi Targets for the Chemical Sector

The latest on SBTi Targets for the Chemical Sector

Science-based targets (SBTi) has been developing sector-specific guidelines to facilitate the adoption of science-based targets…

LaserWay: Investigating environmental performance of high-speed laser technologies

LaserWay: Investigating environmental performance of high-speed laser technologies

LaserWay is a Horizon Europe research project which focusses on revolutionising the manufacturing industry through…

Ecomatters Webinar: PEFCR – Preparation for Industry

Ecomatters Webinar: PEFCR – Preparation for Industry

Join Us for a 1-Hour Webinar: “Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR): Preparation for Industry”…

Baseline restatement in the GHG Protocol: Why does it matter?

Baseline restatement in the GHG Protocol: Why does it matter?

Establishing a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions baseline is a fundamental step in any corporate sustainability…

Ecomatters and ARCHE Consulting announce new partnership

Ecomatters and ARCHE Consulting announce new partnership

Ecomatters is beginning 2025 with an exciting announcement! We are joining forces with ARCHE Consulting…

Ecomatters 2024 highlights: Read about our year in sustainability

Ecomatters 2024 highlights: Read about our year in sustainability

Ecomatters had a busy 2024! As we continue to settle into our new office space,…

Back To Top